AC GENESIS Chapter
37AC 4661.
Before the preceding chapter the explication was continued of what the Lord
foretold concerning the last time of the church, and there was unfolded what He
foretold by the parable of the ten virgins (Matt. 25:1-13). After this
follows another parable that of the servants to whom the man going into a far
country gave talents, to one five, to another two, and to another one, that they
might trade therewith; and of these servants he who received five talents gained
by them five more, he who received two also gained by them two, and he who
received the one hid it in the earth. As this parable involves almost the same
things as the parable of the ten virgins, I may pass on to explain the
concluding part of the same chapter, which in the letter is as follows:-
AC 4662.
When the Son of man shall come in His glory, and all the holy angels with Him,
then shall He sit upon the throne of His glory; and before Him shall be gathered
all nations, and He shall separate them one from another as a shepherd
separateth the sheep from the goats; and He shall set the sheep on His right
hand, but the goats on the left. Then shall the King say unto them on His right
hand, Come ye blessed of My Father, possess the kingdom prepared for you from
the foundation of the world; for I was a hungered, and ye gave Me to eat; I was
thirsty, and ye gave Me to drink; I was a stranger, and ye gathered Me; naked,
and ye clothed Me; I was sick, and ye visited Me; I was in prison, and ye came
unto Me. Then shall the righteous answer Him, saying, Lord, when saw we Thee a
hungered, and fed Thee? or thirsty, and gave Thee to drink? When saw we Thee a
stranger, and gathered Thee? or naked, and clothed Thee? Or when saw we Thee
sick, or in prison, and came unto Thee? And the King shall answer and say unto
them, Verily I say unto you, Inasmuch as ye have done it unto one of the least
of these My brethren, ye have done it unto Me. Then shall He say also unto them
on the left had, Depart from Me ye cursed into eternal fire, prepared for the
devil and his angels; for I was a hungered, and ye gave Me not to eat; I was
thirsty, and ye gave Me not to drink; I was a stranger, and ye gathered Me not;
naked, and ye clothed Me not; [sick, and in prison, and ye visited Me not]. Then
shall they also answer Him, saying, Lord, when saw we Thee a hungered, or
athirst, or a stranger, or naked, or sick or in prison, and did not minister
unto Thee? Then shall He answer them saying, Verily I say unto you, Inasmuch as
ye did it not to one of the least of these, ye did it not to Me. And these shall
go away into eternal punishment, but the righteous into life eternal (Matt.
25:31-46).
AC 4663.
One who is unacquainted with the internal sense cannot but think that these
words were spoken by the Lord of some last day, when all in the whole world will
be gathered before Him, and will then be judged; and also that the procedure of
the Judgment will be just as is described in the letter, namely, that He will
set those who are to be judged on the right hand and on the left, and will speak
to them as in the parable. But one
who is acquainted with the internal sense, and who has learned from other
passages in the Word that the Lord judges no one to eternal fire, but that
everyone judges himself, that is, casts himself into it; and who has also
learned that the Last Judgment of everyone is when he dies, may know in some
measure what these words involve in general. And one who from the internal sense
and from correspondence knows the interior meaning of the words, may know what
they specifically mean, namely, that in the other life everyone receives a
reward in accordance with his life in the world,
[2] Those who vaunt the
salvation of man through faith alone, cannot explain these words in any other
way than by saying that what the Lord said of works means the fruits of faith,
and that He mentioned them merely for the sake of the simple, who are
unacquainted with mysteries. But
even according to their opinion it would still follow that the faults of faith
are what make man blessed and happy after death. The fruits of faith are nothing
else than a life in accordance with the precepts of faith; consequently a life
in accordance with these precepts saves, but not faith without life; for after
death man carries with him all the states of his life, so that he is such as he
has been in the body. For instance: one who in the life of the body has despised
others in comparison with himself, in the other life also despises others in
comparison with himself; one who in the life of the body has regarded the
neighbor with hatred, also in the other life regards the neighbor with hatred;
one who in the life of the body has acted deceitfully toward his companions, in
the other life also acts deceitfully toward his companions; and so in other
instances. Everyone retains in the
other life the nature which he has acquired in the life of the body; and it is
known that a man’s nature cannot be cast out, and that if it is cast out,
nothing of life remains.
[3] It is for this reason
that only works of charity are mentioned by the Lord; for he who is in the works
of charity, or what is the same, in a life of faith, is capable of receiving
faith, if not in the body, yet in the other life; but one who is not in the
works of charity, or in a life of faith, is by no means capable of receiving
faith, either in the body or in the other life. For evil does not accord with truth, but the one rejects the
other; and if those who are in evil speak truths, they speak them from the lips,
and not from the heart, and thus evil and truths are still very far apart.
AC 4664.
But what is involved in the internal sense in these things which the Lord here
says concerning the Last Judgment, that is, concerning the last judgment of
everyone after death, is too much to be unfolded before this chapter, and
therefore will of the Lord‘s Divine mercy be unfolded in order before the
chapters which follow.
GENESIS 37:1-36
1. And Jacob dwelt in the
land of his father’s sojournings, the land of Canaan.
2. These are the births of
Jacob. Joseph a son of seventeen
years was feeding the flock with his brethren; and he was a boy with the sons of
Bilhah and with the sons of Zilpah his father‘s women; and Joseph brought
their evil report unto their father.
3. And Israel loved Joseph
more than all his sons, because he was the son of his old age; and he made him a
tunic of various colors.
4. And his brethren saw that
their father loved him more than all his brethren; and they hated him, and could
not speak for peace unto him,
5. And Joseph dreamed a
dream, and he told it to his brethren, and they added yet to hate him.
6. And he said unto them,
Hear I pray this dream which I have dreamed;
7. And behold we were
binding sheaves in the midst of the field, and lo my sheaf arose, and also stood
upright, and behold your sheaves came round about, and bowed down themselves to
my sheaf.
8. And his brethren said to
him, Shalt thou indeed reign over us? or shalt thou indeed have dominion over
us? and they added yet to hate him for his dreams, and for his words.
9. And he dreamed yet
another dream, and told it to his brethren, and said, Behold I have dreamed yet
a dream, and behold the sun and the moon and eleven stars bowed down themselves
to me.
10. And he told it to his
father, and to his brethren; and his father rebuked him, and said to him, What
is this dream that thou hast dreamed? shall I and thy mother and thy brethren
indeed come to bow down ourselves to thee to the earth?
11. And his brethren envied
him, but his father kept the word.
12. And his brethren went to
feed the flock of their father in Shechem.
13. And Israel said unto
Joseph, Do not thy brethren feed the flock in Shechem? come, and I will send
thee unto them. And he said to him, Behold me!
14. And he said to him, Go I
pray, see the peace of thy brethren, and the peace of the flock, and bring me
word again. And he sent him out of the valley of Hebron, and he came to Shechem.
15. And a man found him, and
behold he was wandering in the field; and the man asked him, saying, What
seekest thou?
16. And he said, I seek my
brethren, tell me I pray where they are feeding the flock.
17. And the man said, They
are departed hence, for I heard them say, Let us go to Dothan. And Joseph went
after his brethren, and found them in Dothan.
18. And they saw him afar
off, and before he came near unto them, they conspired against him to cause him
to die.
19. And they said a man to
his brother, Behold this lord of dreams cometh.
20. Come now therefore and
let us slay him, and cast him into one of the pits, and we will say, An evil
wild beast hath devoured him; and we shall see what his dreams will be.
21. And Reuben heard, and
rescued him out of their hand, and said, Let us not smite him, the soul.
22. And Reuben said unto
them, Shed no blood; cast him into this pit that is in the wilderness, but lay
no hand upon him; that he might rescue him out of their hand, to bring him back
to his father.
23. And it came to pass when
Joseph was come unto his brethren, that they stripped Joseph of his tunic, the
tunic of various colors that was on him;
24. And they took him, and
cast him into the pit; and the pit was empty, there was no water in it
25. And they sat down to eat
bread, and they lifted up their eyes and saw, and behold a company of
Ishmaelites came from Gilead, with their camels bearing spices and balsam and
stacte, going to carry them down to Egypt.
26. And Judah said unto his
brethren, What gain is it if we slay our brother, and conceal his blood?
27. come and let us sell him
to the Ishmaelites, and let not our hand be upon him, for he is our brother, our
flesh. And his brethren harkened unto him.
28. And there passed by men,
Midianites, merchantmen; and they drew and lifted up Joseph out of the pit, and
sold Joseph to the Ishmaelites for twenty pieces of silver. And they brought
Joseph into Egypt.
29. And Reuben returned unto
the pit, and behold Joseph was not in the pit, and he rent his garments,
30. And he returned unto his
brethren, and said, The child is not; and I, whither do I come?
31. And they took Joseph’s
tunic, and killed a he-goat of the goats, and dipped the tunic in the blood;
32. And they sent the tunic
of various colors, and they brought it to their father, and said, This have we
found; know now whether it be thy son‘s tunic or not.
33. And he knew it, and
said, It is my son’s tunic; an evil wild beast hath devoured him; Joseph is
surely torn in pieces.
34. And Jacob rent his
garments, and put sackcloth upon his loins, and mourned over his son many days.
35. And all his sons and all
his daughters rose up to comfort him; but he refused to comfort himself, and he
said, For I shall go down to the grave to my son, mourning.
And his father wept for him.
36. And the Midianites sold
him into Egypt unto Potiphar, Pharoah‘s chamberlain, prince of the guards.
THE CONTENTS
AC 4665.
The subject treated of in this chapter in the internal sense is the truths
Divine which are from the Lord’s Divine Human, that in course of time they
have been rejected in the church, and that at last falsities have been received
in their stead. Specifically, those
are described who are in faith separate
from charity, in that they are against the Lord‘s Divine Human.
THE INTERNAL SENSE
AC 4666.
Verses 1-3. And
Jacob dwelt in the land of his father’s sojournings, in the land of Canaan.
These are the births of Jacob. Joseph
a son of seventeen years was feeding the flock with his brethren; and he was a
boy with the sons of Bilhah and with the sons of Zilpah his father‘s women;
and Joseph brought their evil report unto their father. And Israel loved Joseph
more than all his sons, because he was the son of his old age; and he made him a
tunic of various colors. “And Jacob dwelt in
the land of his father’s sojournings, in the land of Canaan,” signifies that
the Lord‘s Divine natural was accordant under Divine rational good; “these
are the births of Jacob,” signifies the things which follow; “Joseph,”
signifies the Lord’s spiritual Divine Human; “a son of seventeen years,”
signifies its state; “was feeding the flock with his brethren,” signifies
that it was present with those who were in faith and taught; “and he was a
boy,” signifies at first; “with the sons of Bilhah and with the sons of
Zilpah his father‘s women,” signifies that it was rejected by them; “and
Joseph brought their evil report unto their father,” signifies that from it
their quality was apparent; “and Israel loved Joseph more than all his
sons,” signifies the conjunction of the Divine spiritual of the rational with
the Divine spiritual of the natural; “because he was the son of his old
age,” signifies its own life in it; “and he made him a tunic of various
colors,” signifies the appearances of truth thence, whereby the spiritual of
the natural is known and distinguished.
AC 4667.
And Jacob dwelt in the land of his father’s
sojournings, in the land of Canaan. That this
signifies that the Lord‘s Divine natural was accordant under Divine rational
good, is evident from the signification of “to dwell,” as being to live (n.
1293, 3384, 3613, 4451); from the representation of Jacob, as being in the
supreme sense the Lord’s Divine natural (n. 3305, 3509, 3525, 3546, 3576,
3599, 3775, 4009, 4234, 4286, 4538, 4570); from the representation of Isaac, who
here is the “father,” as being the Lord‘s Divine rational as to good (n.
1893, 2066, 2630, 3012, 3194, 3210); and from the signification of the “land
of Canaan,” as being in the supreme sense the Lord’s Divine Human (n. 3038,
3705). From all this it follows that Jacob‘s dwelling in the land of his
father’s sojournings in the land of Canaan, denotes the Lord‘s Divine
natural living together or accordantly under Divine rational good, in the Divine
Human. The Lord’s natural has
been treated of above (Genesis 35:22-26), that all things in it were now
Divine (n. 4602-4610); and in (Genesis 35:27-29) the conjunction of the
Lord‘s Divine natural with His Divine rational (n. 4611-4619).
Here the conclusion follows: that the Divine natural lived an accordant
life under Divine rational good.
[2] It is said “under
Divine rational good,” because the natural lives under this; for the rational
is higher or interior, or according to a customary form of speaking is prior,
while the natural is lower or exterior, consequently posterior; thus the latter
is subordinate to the former. Nay,
when they are accordant, the natural is nothing else than the general of the
rational; for whatever the natural has does not then belong to it, but to the
rational. The difference is only
such as exists between particulars and their general, or between singulars and
their form, in which the singulars appear as a one.
It is known to the learned that the end is the all in the cause, and that
the cause is the all in the effect; thus that the cause is the end in form, and
the effect the cause in form; and hence that the effect entirely perishes if you
take away the cause, and the cause if you take away the end; and moreover that
the cause is under the end, and the effect under the cause.
It is similar with the natural and the rational.
AC 4668.
These are the births of Jacob.
That this signifies the things which follow, is evident from the
signification of “births,” as being the derivations of those things which
are of the church, namely, of truth from good, or of faith from love; for no
other births are meant in the internal sense of the Word. These are also treated
of in what follows, wherefore it is said that the “births of Jacob” denote
the things which follow, That such is the signification of “births” is
evident also from the fact that no genealogical births are mentioned in what
follows; but only Joseph, his dreams, the conspirings of his brothers against
him, and at last his being carried away into Egypt. “Births” denote such
derivations, (n. 1145, 1255, 1330, 3263, 3279, 3860, 3868, 4070).
AC 4669.
Joseph. That
this signifies the Lord’s Divine spiritual Human, is evident from the
representation of Joseph, as being in the supreme sense the Lord as to the
Divine spiritual (n. 3969). That the Lord is represented by Joseph is known in
the church, for when the heavenly Joseph is spoken of, no one else is thought
of; but what of the Lord is represented by Joseph is not so well known, for it
is the Divine spiritual which proceeds from His Divine Human.
The Divine spiritual which proceeds from the Lord‘s Divine Human is the
Divine truth which is from Him in heaven and in the church. The spiritual in its
essence is nothing else. The Divine spiritual, or Divine truth, is also what is
called the Lord’s royalty, and it is likewise signified by the Christ, or the
Messiah (n. 2015, 3009, 3670). For this reason Joseph was made as it were a king
in Egypt, that he might then represent what is of the Lord‘s royalty.
AC 4670.
A son of seventeen years.
That this signifies its state, is evident from the years of the ages of those
mentioned in the Word, in that like other numbers they signify things and
states. All numbers in the Word signify things and states, (n. 575, 647, 648,
1988, 2075, 2252, 3252, 4264, 4495); as also years, (n. 487, 488, 493, 893).
[2] It indeed appears as if
numbers of years, or years of ages, had no further meaning, because they seem to
be more historical than other numbers. But that these also involve things and
states is evident from what was unfolded in the fifth chapter of Genesis, and
said as to the age of Abraham (Gen. 17:1; 25:7), and that of Isaac (Gen.
35:28); and moreover from the fact that there is no historical statement
in the Word which does not involve what is heavenly; into which also it is
changed when it passes from the thought of the man who is reading, to the angels
with him, and through the angels to heaven, where from every historical of the
Word a spiritual sense is produced
[3] But what is signified by
Joseph’s age of seventeen years may be seen from the signification of this
number in other places, namely, a beginning, but here the beginning of the
representation by Joseph, This number signifies a being and what is new, (n.
755, 853). Moreover in a general and potential way this number involves all that
is represented by Joseph; for “seven” signifies holy, and “ten,”
remains. “Seven” in the Word adds holiness, (n. 881); and “ten” denotes
remains, (n. 576, 1906, 2284). That the remains in the Lord by means of which He
united the Human essence to the Divine, were Divine and of Himself, (n. 1906).
AC 4671.
Was feeding the flock with his brethren. That this signifies that it was present with those who were
in faith and taught, is evident from the signification of “feeding the
flock,” as being to teach, specifically from doctrinal things, those who are
in the church. A feeder of the flock or “shepherd” denotes one who teaches,
(n. 343, 3772, 3795). Here is signified that it was present with those who
taught, because it is said that “Joseph was feeding with his brethren;” for
his brethren in this chapter represent the church which turns away from charity
to faith, and at last to faith separate, and so to falsities, as will appear in
what follows.
AC 4672.
And he was a boy.
That this signifies at first, is evident from the signification of a
“boy,” when predicated of a new church, as being what is at first, or its
first state; for the church is as an infant, a boy, a man, and at last an old
man, for it passes through its several ages like a man.
The church also in general is like a man, and is so called.
Moreover in the church which from its age is called a “boy,” and is
such as quickly to turn away, the Lord is at first present, both with those who
teach and with those who learn; but afterwards He is sent away by them, as is
represented by Joseph‘s being cast by his brethren into a pit and sold.
[2] Such is every church
which begins from faith, but very different is the church which begins from
charity. The church which begins
from faith has nothing to direct it but the understanding, and the understanding
nothing but what is hereditary in man, that is to say’ the love of self and of
the world. These persuade the
understanding to search for things from the Word that will confirm them, “and
to explain away what is not confirmatory. It
is otherwise with the church which begins from charity: good is its director,
and in good the Lord; for between the Lord and faith there intervenes the good
of charity and of love, and without this intervention there can be no spiritual
communication, for there is no influx without an intermediate. If evil is in the
place of good, it drives away the Lord, and either rejects or perverts all
things that are of Him, thus all that are of faith, for faith is from Him
through good.
AC 4673.
With the sons of Bilhah, and with the sons of
Zilpah, his father‘s women. That this
signifies that it was rejected by them, is evident from the signification of
”the sons of Bilhah and the sons of Zilpah,“ as being exterior or lower
affections of truth that serve as means (n. 3849, 3931); thus ”with the sons
of Bilhah and with the sons of Zilpah“ signifies that Divine truth, which is
”Joseph,“ was rejected to lower things, which are relatively things of
service. Divine truth is said to be rejected to lower things when faith is
placed before charity or becomes primary in the heart, and charity is placed
after it and becomes secondary in the heart; for all Divine truth is from Divine
good and thence proceeds If the like is not the case with a man, he is not in
the Lord. This Divine truth is the holy itself of the spirit which proceeds from
the Lord, and which is called the ”Paraclete,“ and the ”Spirit of truth“
(John 14:16, 17).
AC 4674.
And Joseph brought their evil report unto their
father. That this signifies that from it their
quality was apparent, is evident from the representation of Joseph, as being the
Divine spiritual or Divine truth which is from the Lord (n. 4286, 4675); from
the signification of ”father,“ as being good (n. 3703, 3704), here the good
of the Ancient Church which is represented by Jacob, as will be seen toward the
end of this chapter; and from the signification of an ”evil report,“ as
being the faults and vices of those signified by Joseph’s brethren, who as
before said (n. 4671) denote those of the church who turn away from good and
truth. This shows what is signified
by these words in the proximate internal sense, namely, that the faults and
vices signified by Joseph‘s brethren were exposed to dew or made apparent by
Divine truth when they were regarded from the good of the Ancient Church; or
what is the same thing, that from this truth their quality was apparent.
[2] In regard to these
things the case is this: The falsities and evils of the church (that is, of
those who are in the church) do not appear to those who are therein, for
falsities are not seen from falsities, nor evils from evils, because principles
of falsity completely befog truths, and a life of evil extinguishes them.
Both principles of falsity and a life of evil induce an appearance that
falsities are truths and truths falsities, and that good is evil and evil good.
That this is so is evident from manifold experience, But the church, or
they who are in the church, appear entirely different in heaven; for in heaven
there is Divine truth from the Lord, and Divine truth in heaven is light, and in
this light their quality is apparent. For
every man as to his soul or spirit is in some society, either angelic or
diabolical. His thought is there, but his speech and actions are among men in
various intercourse with them.
[3] How the case further is
in regard to the quality of those who are in the church being made apparent by
Divine truth, or in Divine light, may appear from the following considerations,
Before evil spirits who are recently from the world cast themselves into hell,
they above all others suppose that they will be received into heaven, believing
that only reception is needed, and that everyone, of whatever quality, may of
grace be admitted into heaven. But
they are sometimes told that heaven is denied by the Lord to no one, and that
they may be admitted if they are able to stay there. Some of them are even taken
up into the first societies, at the entrance to heaven; but when they come
thither they begin to be tormented and almost suffocated, so distressed is the
life of their thought and will the life of their thought from principles of
falsity, and the life of their will from a life of evil, in the world.
And when they look at themselves in the light there, they appear to
themselves as devils, some as corpses, and others as monsters, and they
therefore cast themselves headlong down from that society, and from its light
into some dark infernal mist, where they recover their former respiration, and
where from phantasy they appear to themselves as spirits not evil. In this way
they learn their quality. From this
it is now clear in what manner it should be understood that from it (that is,
from Divine truth) their quality was apparent,
AC 4675.
Now Israel loved Joseph more than all his sons.
That this signifies the conjunction of the Divine spiritual of the rational with
the Divine spiritual of the natural, is evident from the representation of Jacob
when called ”Israel,“ as being the Divine spiritual of the natural, or the
celestial of the spiritual from the natural (n. 4286, 4598); from the
representation of Joseph, as being the Divine spiritual of the rational, or the
celestial of the spiritual from the rational (n. 4286, 4592); and from the
signification of ”loving,“ as being to be conjoined, for love is spiritual
conjunction. Hence it is evident that by Israel’s loving Joseph is signified
the conjunction of the Divine spiritual of the rational with the Divine
spiritual of the natural. Because this conjunction is treated of, Jacob here is
not called ”Jacob,“ as in the first and second verses, but ”Israel;“ and
from the changing of the name it may be inferred that some secret thing is
contained here in the internal sense. But what is the nature of the conjunction
of the Divine spiritual of the rational with the Divine spiritual of the natural
cannot as yet be unfolded, because it is not treated of in this chapter, but in
the chapters which follow, in which so far as possible this secret will be
unfolded. This only is to be said here that the spiritual is predicated both of
the rational and of the natural; for the spiritual is the Divine truth which is
from the Lord, and which when it shines in the rational or in the internal man,
is called the spiritual of the rational; and when it shines thence in the
natural or in the external man, is called the spiritual of the natural.
AC 4676.
Because he was the son of his old age.
That this signifies its own life in it, is evident from the signification of
”old age,“ as being the putting off of a former state and the putting on of
a new one, also as being newness of life (n. 3492, 4620). For ”old age“ in
the internal sense does not signify old age, because the internal man, or
man‘s spirit, does not know what old age is; but as the body or external man
grows old, the internal passes into newness of life, man’s spirit being
perfected by age as his bodily powers diminish. This is still more so in the
other life, where those who are in heaven are continually brought by the Lord
into more perfect life, and at last into the bloom of youth, even those who have
died in a good Old age. From this
it may be seen that by ”old age“ in the internal sense, is signified life,
What is meant by its own life being in it has been explained above (n. 4667).
[2] It was said that man‘s
spirit or internal man does not know what old age is, and yet as before said it
is this spirit that thinks in the body, and from it the body has its life.
The reason why this thought of the spirit cannot be communicated to the
body, and the man thus know that he lives after death, is that so long as his
spirit remains in the body he cannot think otherwise than from the principles
which his natural man has become imbued with; and when the principle and
persuasion is that only the body lives, and that when this dies everything of
man dies, the influx of this reality is not received. But still the influx
manifests itself by the fact that most persons are solicitous about their burial
and eulogies after death, and some about their reputation then, for which reason
they erect magnificent monuments for themselves,
that their memory may not perish, Into such things is turned the influx from
heaven in respect to the permanent of life with those who in other respects have
no belief in it, For without this influx they would be totally indifferent to
all that concerns their memory after death.
AC 4677.
And he made him a tunic
of various colors.
That this signifies the appearances of truth thence, whereby the spiritual of
the natural is known and distinguished, is evident from the signification of a
”tunic,“ as being the truth of the natural, of which hereafter; and from the
signification of ”various colors,“ as being the appearance of truth by which
the spiritual of the natural is known and distinguished, That these are
signified by ”various colors“ cannot be known by anyone unless be knows that
colors appear in the other life equally as in the world- colors which in beauty
and variety far surpass those in this world and unless he knows what is the
source of these colors. The colors
seen in the other life are from the variation of the light there, and are so to
speak modifications of intelligence and wisdom; for the light which appears
there is from the Divine truth that is from the Lord, or is the Divine spiritual
from, Him, or what is the same, is Divine intelligence and wisdom, which appears
as light before the eyes of angels and spirits. Hence
it is evident what is signified by the colors from that light, namely, qualities
of truth, thus its appearances, and that they appear from the affections of good
and truth. Concerning the colors in the other life see (n. 1042, 1043, 1053,
1624, 3993, 4530).
[2] That a ”tunic“ is
the truth of the natural was said above (n. 3301), but as it was not there
shown, I may now confirm it here from other passages in the Word.
As the kings in the Jewish Church represented the Lord as to the Divine
spiritual, or Divine truth (n. 2015, 2069, 3009, 3670), therefore their
daughters were clothed in tunics of various colors, for by ”daughters“ were
signified affections of good and truth, and therefore churches (n. 2362, 3963);
of whom we read in the second book of Samuel:--
There
was upon Tamar, David’s daughter, a tunic of various colors, for with such
robes were the king‘s daughters that were virgins apparelled (2 Samuel
13:18).
[3] And because the high
priests represented the Lord as to the Divine celestial or Divine good, Aaron
was clothed in garments that represented the Divine truth which is from the
Divine good of the Lord; for Divine good is in the Lord, but Divine truth
proceeds from Him, and is what was represented by these garments.
So also when the Lord was transfigured before Peter, James, and John, the
Divine good appeared as the sun, and the Divine truth was presented as raiment
which appeared as the light (Matt. 17:2).
[4] The garments in which
Aaron and his sons were clothed are thus described in Moses:--
Thou
shalt make for Aaron a tunic of fine linen, and a miter of fine linen, and thou
shalt make a belt, the work of the embroiderer. And for Aaron’s sons thou
shalt make tunics, and thou shalt make for them belts, and headtires shalt thou
make for them, for glory and for adornment (Exod. 28:39, 40).
Every particular here
signified something pertaining to the Divine truth from the Divine good of the
Lord, the ”tunic of fine linen“ specifically signifying the Divine
spiritual. So also in another place:--
Thou
shalt take the garments, and put upon Aaron the tunic, and the robe of the
ephod, and the ephod, and the breastplate, and shalt clothe him with the girdle
of the ephod; afterwards thou shall cause his sons to approach, and put tunics
upon them (Exod. 29:5, 8; 40:14).
What these particulars
signify will of the Lord‘s Divine mercy be shown when they come to be treated
of. ”Garments“ in general are truths, (n 297, 1073, 2576, 4545).
[5] The prophets also were
clothed in tunics, but in tunics of hair; because by the prophets the Lord was
represented as to truths of doctrine, and because these are of the natural or
external man, the prophets had tunics of hair, for ”hair“ signifies what is
natural (n. 3301).
[6] That a ”tunic“
signifies Divine truth from the Lord, is still more obvious from those passages
in the New Testament in which ”tunic“ is mentioned, as in John:--
The
soldiers took His garments and made four parts, to every soldier a part, and
also the tunic; now the tunic was without seam, woven from the top throughout
They said therefore one to another, Let us not divide it, that the Scripture
might he fulfilled which saith, They divided my vestments among them, and upon
my tunic did they cast a lot (John 20:23, 24);
one who reads these words
supposes that they involve no greater mystery than that the vestments were
divided among the soldiers, and that a lot was cast upon the tunic, and yet
every particular was representative and significative of something Divine, as
well that the vestments were divided into four parts, as that the tunic was not
divided, but upon it was cast a lot, especially that the tunic was without seam
and woven from the top throughout; for by the ”tunic“ was signified the
Lord’s Divine truth, which as being one only and from good, was represented by
the tunic being without seam and woven from the top throughout
[7] The like was signified
by the ”tunic of Aaron,“ which was woven, or the work of the weaver, as is
evident from Moses:--
They
made the tunics of fine linen, the work of the weaver, for Aaron and for his
sons (Exod. 39:27).
There was also represented
that the Lord did not suffer Divine truth to be rent into parts, as was done by
the Jews with the lower truths of the church.
[8] Because Divine truth
which is from Divine good is one only, the twelve disciples when sent to preach
the gospel of the kingdom were commanded not to have two tunics; as in Luke:--
Jesus
sent the twelve disciples to preach the kingdom of God and He said unto them,
Take nothing for the way, neither staves, nor bag, nor bread, nor silver;
neither have two tunics apiece (Luke 9:2, 3);
and in Mark:--
He
commanded them that they should take nothing for the way save a staff only, no
bag, no bread, no brass in their belt; but be clad with shoes; and put not on
two tunics (Mark 6:8, 9);
And in Matthew:--
Possess
neither gold, nor silver, nor brass in your belts, nor bag for the way, nor two
tunics, nor shoes, nor staves (Matthew 10:9, 10).
[9] All the particulars
herein are representative of the celestial and spiritual things of the Lord‘s
kingdom which the disciples were sent to preach. That they were not to take with them gold, silver, brass,
bag, nor bread, was because these things signified goods and truths which are
from the Lord alone ”gold“ signifying good (n. 113, 1551, 1552);
”silver,“ truth therefrom (n. 1551, 2954); ”brass,“ natural good (n.
425, 1551); ”bread,“ the good of love or celestial good (n. 276, 680, 2165,
2177, 3478, 3735, 4211, 4217). But
the ”tunic“ and ”shoe“ signified the truths with which they were
clothed, and the ”staff“ the power of truth from good. That a ”staff“ is
this power see, (n. 4013, 4015); and that a ”shoe“ is the lowest natural,
(n. 1748), here as to truth. A ”tunic“ is interior natural truth, and
because these things ought not to be double, but single, it was forbidden to
have two staves, two pairs of shoes, or two tunics.
These arcana are within this command of the Lord, and cannot possibly be
known except from the internal sense.
[10] All and each of the
things the Lord said were representative of Divine things, consequently of the
celestial and spiritual things of His kingdom, and thus were adapted to the
apprehension of men, and at the same time to the understanding of spirits and
angels; wherefore those things which the Lord said, filled and continue to fill
the whole heaven. From this it is
evident of what use and importance it is to know the internal sense of the Word.
Moreover without this sense anyone can confirm from the Word whatever
dogma he pleases; and because such is the appearance of the Word to those who
are in evil, they therefore deride it, and are ready to believe anything rather
than that it is Divine.
AC 4678.
Verses 4-11. And his brethren saw that their
father loved him more than all his brethren; and they hated him, and could not
speak for peace unto him. And Joseph dreamed a dream, and he told it to his
brethren, and they added yet to hate him. And he said unto them, Hear I pray
this dream which I have dreamed; and behold we were binding sheaves in the midst
of the field, and lo my sheaf arose, and also stood upright; and behold your
sheaves came round about, and bowed down themselves to my sheaf And his brethren
said to him, shalt thou indeed reign over us? or shalt thou indeed have dominion
over us? and they added yet to hate him for his dreams, and for his words. And
he dreamed yet another dream, and told it to his brethren, and said, Behold I
have dreamed yet a dream, and behold the sun and the moon and eleven stars bowed
down themselves to me. And he told it to his father, and to his brethren; and
his father rebuked him, and said to him, What is this dream that thou hast
dreamed? shall I and thy mother and thy brethren indeed come to bow down
ourselves to thee to the earth? And his brethren envied him, but his father kept
the word.
”And his brethren saw,“ signifies those things which are of faith,
and in the proximate sense the posterity of Jacob; ”that their father loved
him more than all his brethren,“ signifies that it was conjoined with the
Divine natural, and in the proximate sense with the Ancient Church, which is the
”father;“ ”and they hated him, and could not speak for peace unto him,“
signifies contempt and aversion; ”and Joseph dreamed a dream,“ signifies
preaching concerning the Divine Human; ”and he told it to his brethren,“
signifies in the presence of those who are of faith separate; ”and they added
yet to hate him,“ signifies still greater contempt and aversion; ”and he
said unto them, Hear I pray this dream which I have dreamed,“ signifies the
contents of the preaching; ”and behold we were binding sheaves in the midst of
the field,“ signifies that they were teaching from doctrine; ”and lo my
sheaf arose, and also stood upright,“ signifies what is doctrinal concerning
the Lord’s Divine Human; ”and behold your sheaves came round about,“
signifies those who were in faith; ”and bowed down themselves to my sheaf,“
signifies adoration; ”and his brethren said to him,“ signifies those who are
of faith separate; ”shalt thou indeed reign over us? or shalt thou indeed have
dominion over us?“ signifies were they to be subject as to the things of the
understanding and of the will; ”and they added yet to hate him for his dreams
and for his words,“ signifies still greater contempt and aversion because of
the preaching of the Word; ”and he dreamed yet another dream,“ signifies
again a preaching; ”and told it to his brethren, and said,“ signifies in the
presence of those who are of faith separate; ”behold I have dreamed yet a
dream,“ signifies the contents; ”and behold the sun and the moon,“
signifies natural good and natural truth; ”and eleven stars,“ signifies the
knowledges of good and of truth; ”bowed down themselves to me,“ signifies
adoration; ”and he told it to his father and to his brethren,“ signifies
that it was given to know it; ”and his father rebuked him, and said unto him,
What is this dream that thou hast dreamed?“ signifies indignation;
”father“ here is the Jewish religion derived from the Ancient; ”shall I
and thy mother and thy brethren indeed come to bow down ourselves to thee to the
earth?“ signifies whether the
church will adore; ”and his brethren envied him,“ signifies their aversion;
”and his father kept the word,“ signifies that the truth remained in their
religiosity.
AC 4679.
And his brethren saw.
That this signifies those things which are of faith, and in the proximate sense
the posterity of Jacob, is evident from the signification of ”seeing,“ as
being to notice and understand (n. 2150, 2325, 2807, 3764, 3863); and from the
representation of the brethren of Joseph, as being those things which are of
faith. For Joseph in this chapter
represents the Divine spiritual or Divine truth of the Lord; and his brethren
represent the church which turns away from charity to faith, and then to faith
separate from charity, and finally to falsities (n. 4665, 4671).
Thus by the ”brethren“ of Joseph are here signified those things
which are of faith; and because such was the posterity of Jacob, in the
proximate sense that posterity is signified.
AC 4680.
That their father loved him more than all his
brethren. That this signifies that it was
conjoined with the Divine natural, and in the proximate sense with the Ancient
Church, which is the ”father,“ is evident from what was explained above (n.
4675), where similar words occur. That in the proximate sense this signifies that it was
conjoined with the Ancient Church, and that this church is what is meant by
”father,“ is because in this sense, as before said (n. 4679), by Joseph‘s
”brethren“ are signified the posterity of Jacob, and consequently the church
which was represented among them. How
these things are to be understood has already been repeatedly stated, but shall
be repeated again in a few words for the sake of the series in what follows.
[2] The Ancient Church which
was set up by the Lord after the flood was a representative church, and was of
such a nature that all and each of its externals of worship represented the
celestial and spiritual things of the Lord’s kingdom, and in the supreme sense
the Divine things themselves of the Lord; but all and each of its internals of
worship bore relation to charity. This
church was spread over a large part of the Asiatic world, and through many
kingdoms there; and although there were differences among them as to doctrinal
things of faith, still the church was one, because all in every part of it made
charity the essential of the church. Those who at that time separated faith from
charity, and made faith the essential of the church were called ”Ham.“ But
in course of time this church turned away to idolatry, and in Egypt, Babylon,
and other places, to magic; for they began to worship external things without
the internal; and as they thus receded from charity, heaven also receded from
them, and in its place came spirits from hell who led them.
[3] When this church was
desolated, a kind of new church began from Heber, which was called the Hebrew
Church. This church existed in
Syria and Mesopotamia, and also among some nations in the land of Canaan; but
this new church differed from the Ancient, in that it made the essential of
external worship to consist in sacrifices.
It did indeed acknowledge the internal of worship to be charity, but not
so much from the heart as did the Ancient Church; but this church also became
idolatrous.
[4] At last it pleased the
Lord to set up among the posterity of Abraham from Jacob a new kind of church,
and to introduce among that nation the externals of worship of the Ancient
Church. But such was the nature of
this nation that they could not receive any internal of the church, because
their hearts were altogether opposed to charity; and therefore only a
representative of a church was instituted among them.
This then is the reason why the sons of Jacob, or Joseph‘s brethren,
signify in the proximate sense such a church, and why Jacob their father
signifies the Ancient Church. In many other places in the Word, especially the
prophetic, the Ancient Church is meant by ”Jacob;“ and sometimes also that
Ancient Church is called ”father and mother“, ”father“ as to its good,
and ”mother“ as to its truth. From this it is now evident that by their
father’s loving Joseph more than all his brethren is signified that the Divine
truth of the Lord was conjoined with the Ancient Church.
AC 4681.
And they hated him, and could not speak for
peace unto him. That this signifies contempt
and aversion contempt for the Divine truth which is represented by Joseph, and
aversion for it is evident from the signification of ”hating,“ as being to
hold in contempt, for ”hatred“ in the internal sense does not signify hatred
such as men have who hate, for the signification of the word grows milder as it
rises into heaven, because in heaven they do not know what hatred is, and
therefore contempt is what is signified; and from the signification of ”not
being able to speak for peace unto him,“ as being to be averse to. For to
”speak for peace“ means to wish anyone well, inasmuch as by ”peace“ the
ancients understood in the supreme sense the Lord Himself, in the internal sense
His kingdom and life therein, or salvation, but in the external sense safety or
health in the world. The contrary of this is not to be able to speak for peace
to anyone, that is, not to wish him well, thus to be averse to, here to Divine
truth.
AC 4682.
And Joseph dreamed a dream.
That this signifies preaching concerning It, is evident from the
signification of ”dreaming a dream,“ as being to preach; and because the
dream treats of Joseph, preaching concerning the Lord‘s Divine Human is
signified That a ”dream“ here signifies preaching, is because in Joseph’s
two dreams are contained in a summary all the things which were foreseen and
provided in regard to Joseph, or in the internal sense all that were foreseen
and provided in regard to Divine truth within such a church as is represented by
Joseph‘s brethren, or such as begins from faith. Moreover Divine truths were
manifested in ancient times either by speech, by visions, or by dreams, and from
these were the preachings; consequently by ”prophets“ in the Word, to whom
Divine truth was manifested by speech, by visions, or by dreams, are signified
those who teach truths, and in the abstract sense the truths of doctrine (n.
2534).
[2] The like is therefore
signified by ”seeing visions“ and ”dreaming dreams;“ as in Joel:--
I
will pour out My spirit upon all flesh, and your sons and your daughters shall
prophesy, your old men shall dream dreams, your young men shall see visions; and
also upon the servants and upon the maid-servants in those days will I pour out
My spirit (Joel 2:28, 29);
where ”pouring out the
spirit upon them“ denotes to instruct concerning truths, and ”prophesying“
denotes to teach and preach them, and the same is signified by ”dreaming
dreams.“ ”Old men“ are the wise, ”young men“ the intelligent,
”servants“ those who know.
[3] In Jeremiah:--
Thus
saith Jehovah Zebaoth, Attend not unto the words of the prophets that prophesy
unto you they make you vain, they speak a vision of their own heart, and not out
of the mouth of Jehovah. I have heard what the prophets have said, that prophesy
a lie in My name, saying, I have dreamed, I have dreamed. The prophet that hath
a dream, let him tell a dream but he that hath My word, let him tell My word in
truth. Behold I am against them that prophesy dreams of a lie, saith Jehovah
they tell them, and lead My people astray by their lies (Jer. 23:16, 25,
28, 32);
where again
”prophesying“ denotes to teach and preach, but from dreams of a lie, from
which is their preaching.
[4] In like manner elsewhere
(Jer. 29:8, 9; Zech. 10:2) In Moses:--
If
there arise in the midst of thee a prophet, or a dreamer of a dream, who shall
give thee a sign or a wonder, and the sign or the wonder come to pass, whereof
he spake unto thee, saying, Let us go after other gods which thou hast not
known, and let us serve them thou shalt not obey the words of that prophet, or
that dreamer of a dream. And that prophet, or that dreamer of a dream, shall be
killed, because he hath spoken revolt against Jehovah your God (Deut.
13:1-3, 5);
both a ”prophet“ and a
”dreamer of a dream“ denote one who teaches and preaches, here falsities.
AC 4683.
And he told it to his brethren.
That this signifies in the presence of those who are of faith separate,
is evident from the representation of Joseph’s brethren, as being the church
which turns away from charity to faith, or in the abstract sense the things of
faith, as above (n. 4665, 4671, 4679); here, those who are of faith separate
from charity, because it follows that ”they added yet to hate him,“ by which
words are signified still greater contempt and aversion.
For as regards this church the fact is that at its beginning charity is
preached, but merely as a matter of doctrine, and thus of memory-knowledge, but
not from charity itself, thus not from affection, or from the heart.
In course of time, as charity and affection are obliterated in the heart,
faith is preached; and at last when there is no longer any charity, faith alone,
and this is said to be saving without works; then also works are no longer
called works of charity, but works of faith, and are called the fruits of faith.
[2] In this way men do
indeed conjoin charity and faith, but from doctrine merely, not from life.
And because they vest nothing of salvation in a life of faith, or in
good, but only in faith (although they know very well from the Word, and also
from their own intelligence, that doctrine is nothing without life, or that
faith is nothing without fruits), they vest the saving power of faith in
confidence, that in this way they may also get away from fruits; not knowing
that all confidence derives its being from the life‘s purpose, and that
genuine confidence is impossible except in good, but that a spurious and false
confidence is possible even in evil. And
in order that they may still further separate faith from charity, they also
insist that the confidence of a single moment will save, even
life’s last moments, no matter what the previous life has been;
although they know that everyone‘s life remains with him after death, and that
everyone will be judged according to the works of his life.
From these few words it may be seen what is the quality of faith separate
from charity, and Consequently what the church is that makes faith, and not a
life of faith, the essential. The
falsities which flow thence as from their fountain head, will of the Lord’s
Divine mercy be spoken of in the following pages.
AC 4684.
And they added yet to hate him.
That this signifies still greater contempt and aversion, is evident from
what was said above (n. 4681), where similar words occur.
AC 4685.
And he said unto them, Hear I pray this dream
which I have dreamed.
That this signifies the contents of the preaching, is evident from the
signification of ”dreaming a dream,“ as being a preaching (n. 4682); here
the contents of the preaching, because the description of his dream now follows.
AC 4686.
For behold we were binding sheaves in the midst
of the field.
That this signifies that they were teaching from doctrine, is evident
from the signification of a ”sheaf,“ as being doctrine, and hence of
”binding sheaves,“ as being to teach from doctrine; and from the
signification of a ”field,“ as being the, church (n. 2971, 3766, 4440,
4443). The ”midst of the field“ is what is interior in the church, thus it
is those who are in the faith of some charity; for the ”midst“ in the
internal sense is what is interior and what is inmost (n. 1074, 2940, 2973).
For there are some in every church who are in the midst of it, or who are
inmost, being those who are in charity, here those who are in the faith of some
charity. With these the Lord is present, because the Lord is in charity, and
through charity in faith (n. 4672). That these are signified is evident also
from what follows that Joseph‘s sheaf arose, and the other sheaves came round
about it; for by Joseph’s sheaf is signified doctrine from the Lord‘s Divine
truth.
[2] That a ”sheaf“
signifies doctrine is because as just said a field is the church, and the
standing corn in a field is the truth in the church; therefore a sheaf in which
there is corn signifies doctrine in which there is truth.
”Sheaves“ have a similar signification in David:--
They
that sow in tears shall reap with singing; going he shall go and weeping he that
beareth the cast of seed, but coming he shall come with singing, bearing his
sheaves (Ps. 126:5, 6);
said of those who have been
in spiritual captivity and are liberated. To ”bear the cast of seed“ denotes
instruction in truths, to ”come with singing“ denotes the gladness of the
affection of truth, and to ”bear the sheaves,“ the doctrinal things of this
truth.
AC 4687.
And lo my sheaf arose, and also stood upright.
That this signifies what is doctrinal concerning the Lord’s Divine
Human, is evident from the signification of a ”sheaf,“ as being doctrine;
and from the signification of ”arising and standing upright,“ as being the
supreme that should reign, and that they would adore.
That this is the Lord‘s Divine Human is evident from what follows,
namely, that the eleven sheaves bowed down themselves to that sheaf, and in the
second dream, that the sun and the moon and eleven stars bowed down themselves
to Joseph, whereby is signified the supreme that should reign, and that they
would adore; wherefore also Jacob says, ”Shall I and thy mother and thy
brethren indeed come to bow down ourselves to thee to the earth?“ As before
said the Divine truth of the Lord is what is represented by Joseph; the supreme
of this is the Lord Himself, and the supreme among doctrinal things is that His
Human is Divine.
[2] With this supreme of
doctrinal things the case is this: The Most Ancient Church, which was celestial,
and which above all others was called Man, adored the infinite being, and the
derivative infinite coming-forth; and because, from the things which could be
perceived in their internal man and those which could be felt in their external,
and from the visible things in the world, the men of that church could have no
perception of the infinite being, but could have some perception of the
derivative infinite coming-forth, they therefore adored the infinite
coming-forth in which is the infinite being.
The infinite coming-forth in which is the infinite being they perceived
as a Divine Man, because they knew that the infinite coming-forth was brought
forth through heaven from the infinite being; and as heaven is the Grand Man,
corresponding to each and all things that are in man (as has been shown at the
end of the preceding chapters, and will be shown at the end of several to
follow), they therefore could have no other idea of perception concerning the
infinite coming-forth from the infinite being, than as of a Divine Man; for
whatever from the infinite being passes through heaven as the Grand Man is
attended with an image thereof in each and all things.
When that celestial church began to fall away, they foresaw that the
infinite coming-forth could no longer have influx into the minds of men, and
that so the human race would perish; therefore it was revealed to them that One
should be born who would make the Human in Himself Divine, and in this way
become the same infinite coming-forth as had been before, and would at last
become one with the infinite being as also it had been before.
From this came their prophecy in Genesis concerning the Lord (Gen.
3:15).
[3] This is described in John
in these words:
In
the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God, and God was the Word. The
same was in the beginning with God. All thing were made by Him, and without Him
was not anything made that was made. In Him was life, and the life was the light
of men. And the Word was made flesh, and dwelt among us; and we beheld His
glory, the glory as of the only begotten of the Father, full of grace and truth
(John 1:1-4, 14);
the ”Word“ is the Divine
truth, which in its essence is the infinite coming-forth from the infinite
being, and is the Lord Himself as to His Human. This very Human it is from which truth Divine now proceeds
and flows into heaven, and through heaven into the minds of men; consequently
which rules and governs the universe, as it has ruled and governed it from
eternity; for it is one and the same with the infinite being, because He
conjoined the Human with the Divine, which was done by this, that He made the
Human in Himself also Divine. From this it is now evident that the supreme of
truth Divine is the Lord’s Divine Human, and hence that the supreme among the
doctrinal things of the church is that His Human is Divine.
AC 4688.
And behold your sheaves came round about.
That this signifies those who were in faith, namely, in the faith of some
charity, is evident from the signification of ”coming round about,“ as here
being an approaching to adore, for it follows that ”they bowed down themselves
to his sheaf,“ by which is signified adoration; and from the signification of
a ”sheaf,“ as being doctrine (n. 4686), here all things of doctrine, or all
things of faith. That ”sheaves“ here have such a signification is because in
the genuine sense all things of faith are represented by all the sons of Jacob
(n. 3858, 3926), thus also by the sheaves, because these in the dream took the
place of the sons of Jacob; and also because the scene lay in the midst of the
field, and by the midst of the field is signified what is interior, or those who
are interior in the church (n. 4686), thus those who are in the faith of some
charity. These therefore are the ”sheaves which came round about, and bowed
down themselves to the sheaf of Joseph.“ That those are not meant who are
exterior or more remote from the midst, and who in the proper sense are here the
”brethren“ of Joseph, is plain from what precedes and what follows that they
hated him more and more, that is, despised him and felt aversion; for
”hating,“ ”not speaking for peace,“ and ”envying,“ which are said of
his brethren, signify contempt and aversion.
AC 4689.
And bowed down themselves to my sheaf.
That this signifies adoration, is evident from the signification of ”bowing
down themselves,“ as being the effect of humiliation (n. 2153), consequently
adoration; and from the signification of ”Joseph‘s sheaf,“ as here being
the doctrine concerning the Lord’s Divine Human (n. 4686), thus it signifies
the Divine Human which those in the interior of the church adored.
but those who are exterior, that is, those who are of faith separate, are
as far as possible from adoring. Faith
separate from charity has this effect because as before said the Lord is present
in charity, and in faith only through charity; for charity is the conjoining
medium. What is truth without good?
and what is the intellect without the will? thus what is faith without charity?
or what is confidence without its essence?
[2] That they who are in
faith separate from charity do not at all adore the Lord‘s Divine Human, was
made evident to me from those of this character who come into the other life
from the Christian world, with many of whom I have spoken; for in that life the
heart speaks, and not the mouth as in the world. The thoughts of everyone are there communicated much more
clearly than by any speech in the world; and no one is allowed to speak
otherwise than as he thinks and believes. Many
of those who in the world have even preached the Lord, there wholly deny Him;
and when it is inquired from what end or for what reason they preached Him, and
also in outward holy form adored Him, it is found that they did so because it
was incumbent upon them on account of the office which they held, and because
they thereby gained honors and wealth; and that those who did not preach Him,
but yet confessed Him, did so because they were born in the church, and because
they would lose their reputation if they should speak against religion. Not a
single person from the Christian world knew that the Lord’s Human is Divine;
and scarcely anyone knew that He alone rules heaven and the universe, still less
that His Divine Human is the all in heaven. That this is so, could not be openly revealed, because it was
foreseen by the Lord that the Christian Church would turn away from charity to
faith, consequently would separate itself from Him, and so not only reject but
also profane the holy which is from His Divine Human; for faith separate from
charity cannot do otherwise.
[3] That faith is at this
day separated from charity, is evident; for churches separate from one another
according to their dogmas, and whoever believes differently from what their
dogma teaches is cast out from their communion, and is also defamed. But one who
robs, and without mercy deprives others of their possessions, provided he does
not do it openly, who schemes craftily against the neighbor, who brings the
works of charity into disrepute, and who commits adultery - he is nevertheless
called a Christian, provided he frequents sacred observances and speaks in
accordance with doctrine. From this it is evident that at this day it is
doctrine, not life, that constitutes the church; and that the fruits which are
adjoined to faith are in their doctrine only, and not at all in their minds.
AC 4690.
And his brethren said to him.
That this signifies those who are of faith separate, is evident from the
representation of Joseph‘s brethren, as being the church which turns away from
charity to faith, and at last separates faith from charity (n. 4665, 4671,
4679); but those who are interior in this church are signified by the
”sheaves“ in the dream (n. 4686, 4688). The reason why Joseph’s brethren
represent this church is that in the proximate sense they signify the
representative of a church, or the religiosity which was instituted among the
posterity of Jacob, which posterity did not indeed know anything about faith as
it is understood in the Christian Church, but only about the Truth was to them
the same as faith is to Christians, moreover in the Hebrew language the same
word is used for both. But the Jewish Church understood by truth the precepts of
the Decalogue, and also the laws, judgments, testimonies, and statutes, which
were handed down by Moses. They did not know the interiors of truth, nor did
they wish to know them.
[2] The Christian Church
however gives the name of faith to those doctrinal matters which they say are
the interior things of the church and must be believed; for by faith the common
people understand no other than the faith of creeds, or that which book of
creeds teach; but those who think that the doctrinal things of faith or the
knowledge of them cannot save anyone, and that few are in a life of faith, call
confidence faith. These however are
above the common people, and are more learned than others. From these things it
is evident that the subject here treated of in the internal sense is not only
the representative of a church which was instituted with the posterity of Jacob,
but also the Christian Church which succeeded; for the Word of the Lord is
universal, and comprehends in general every church.
For it was equally foreseen by the Lord both how the case would be with
the Christian Church, and how it would be with the Jewish Church, but
proximately with the Jewish, wherefore this sense is called the proximate sense,
or the internal historical sense, and the other the internal sense.
AC 4691.
Shalt thou indeed reign over us? or shalt thou
indeed have dominion over us?
That this signifies were they to be subject as to the things of the
understanding and of the will, is evident from the signification of
”reigning,“ as being to be subject as to the things of the understanding;
and from the signification of ”having dominion,“ as being to be subject as
to the things of the will. That
”to reign over them and to have dominion over them“ denotes that they were
to be made subject is evident, but the reason why the two expressions are here
used is that one refers to the things of the understanding, and the other to the
things of the will. It is common in the Word, especially the prophetic, for one
thing to be expressed in two ways; and he who does not know the mystery in this,
cannot but think it a mere repetition for the sake of emphasis.
But this is not so, for in every particular of the Word there is the
heavenly marriage, namely, the marriage of truth with good and of good with
truth; just as there is a marriage of the understanding and the will in man. One
expression has reference to truth, the other to good; thus one has reference to
the intellect, for to this belongs truth, and the other to the will, for to this
belongs good. Moreover the expressions in the Word consist of terms that
constantly have such a signification. This
is the secret which lies concealed in two expressions being used for one thing
(n. 683, 793, 801, 2173, 2516, 2712, 4138). So also here in regard to
”reigning over them“ and ”having dominion over them“ - ”reigning“
refers to truth which is of the understanding, and ”having dominion“ to good
which is of the will. ”Kingdom“ is also predicated of truth (n. 1672, 2547),
and ”dominion“ of good, as in Daniel,
in which passage also the subject is the Lord‘s Divine Human:
There
was given Him dominion and glory and a kingdom, that all people, nations, and
languages should worship Him; His dominion is an everlasting dominion, which
shall not pass away, and His kingdom that which shall not perish (Daniel
7:14);
and in David:
Thy
kingdom is a kingdom of all eternities, and Thy dominion is into all generation
and generation (Ps. 145:13).
AC 4692.
And they added yet to hate him for his dreams,
and for his words. That this signifies still
greater contempt and aversion because of the preaching of truth - here
concerning the Lord’s Divine Human - is evident from the signification of
”adding,“ as being more; from the signification of ”hating,“ as being to
despise and be averse to (n. 4681); from the signification of a ”dream,“ as
being preaching (n. 4682, 4685); and from the signification of ”words,“ as
being truths. That ”words“ denote truths is because every word in heaven is
from the Lord; therefore ”words“ in the internal sense signify truths, and
the ”Word“ in general signifies all Divine truth.
[2] As regards the subject
itself, this is the supreme truth of all which the church that has separated
faith from charity especially despises, and to which it is averse, namely, that
the Human of the Lord is Divine. All
who were of the Ancient Church and did not separate charity from faith, believed
that the God of the universe was a Divine Man, and that He was the Divine being;
and hence they named Him ”Jehovah.“ They knew this from the most ancient
people, and also because He had appeared as a Man to some of their brethren.
They also knew that all the rituals and externals of their church represented
Him. But those who were of faith separate could not so believe, because they
could not comprehend how the Human could be Divine, nor could they comprehend
that the Divine love effected this; for whatever they did not comprehend from
some idea received through the external senses of the holy, they regarded as
nothing. Faith separate from charity is attended with this, for with those who
hold it the internal of perception is closed, as there is no intermediate
through which there can be influx.
[3] The Jewish Church which
succeeded did indeed believe that Jehovah was Man and also God, because He had
appeared as a man to Moses and the prophets, for which reason the Jews called
every angel who appeared to them ”Jehovah;“ nevertheless they had no other
idea of Him than the Gentiles had of their gods, to whom the Jews preferred
Jehovah God because He could perform miracles (n. 4299), not knowing that
Jehovah was ”the Lord“ in the Word (n. 2921, 3035), and that it was His
Divine Human which all their rituals represented.
Their only thought of the Messiah or Christ was that He would be the
greatest prophet, greater than Moses; and the greatest king, greater than David,
who would bring them with stupendous miracles into the land of Canaan.
They did not wish to hear anything about His heavenly kingdom, because
they apprehended nothing but worldly things, for they were separated from
charity.
[4] The Christian Church,
however, in external worship does indeed adore the Lord‘s Human as Divine,
especially in the Holy Supper, because He said that the bread therein was His
body, and the wine His blood; but in their doctrine they make His Human not
Divine, for they make a distinction between the Divine nature and the human
nature. The reason of this also is
that the church has turned away from charity to faith, and at last to faith
separate. And because they do not
acknowledge the Lord’s Human to be Divine, many stumble and at heart deny Him
(n. 4689). Nevertheless the truth is that the Lord‘s Divine Human is the
Divine coming-forth from the Divine being, spoken of above (n. 4687), and that
He is the Divine being, for the Divine being and the Divine coming-forth are
one, as also the Lord plainly teaches in John
Jesus
said to Philip, Have I been so long time with you, and hast thou not known Me?
He that hath seen Me hath seen the Father. Believest thou not that I am in the
Father, and the Father in Me? Believe Me that I am in the Father, and the Father
in Me (John 14:9-11);
and also in other places.
For the Divine coming-forth is the Divine Itself proceeding from the
Divine being, and in image is a Man; because heaven, of which it is the all,
represents a Grand Man, as was said above (n. 4687), and has been shown at the
end of the chapters, in the correspondence of all things in man therewith.
[5] The Lord was indeed born
as is another man, and had an infirm human from the mother; but this human the
Lord entirely cast out, so that He was no longer the son of Mary, and made the
Human in Himself Divine, which is meant by His being glorified; and He also
showed to Peter, James, and John, when He was transfigured, that He was a Divine
Man.
AC 4693.
And he dreamed yet another dream.
That this signifies again a preaching, is evident from the signification of a
”dream,“ as being a preaching (n. 4682).
AC 4694.
And told it to his brethren, and said.
That this signifies in the presence of those who are of faith separate, is
evident from the representation of Joseph’s brethren, as being those who are
of faith separate (n. 4665, 4671, 4679, 4690).
AC 4695.
Behold I have dreamed yet a dream.
That this signifies the contents of the preaching, is evident from what was said
above (n. 4685).
AC 4696.
And behold the sun and the moon.
That this signifies natural good and natural truth, is evident from the
signification of the ”sun,“ as being celestial good (n. 1529, 1530, 2120,
2441, 2495, 3636, 3643, 4060); and from the signification of the ”moon,“ as
being spiritual good, or truth (n. 1529, 1530, 2495). The ”sun“ in the
supreme sense signifies the Lord, because He appears as a sun to those in heaven
who are in celestial love; and the ”moon“ also in the supreme sense
signifies the Lord, because He appears as a moon to those in heaven who are in
spiritual love; all the light in heaven is thence. Therefore the light from the
sun there is the celestial of love, or good, and the light from the moon there
is the spiritual of love, or truth; in the present passage therefore the
”sun“ is natural good, and the ”moon“ natural truth, because they are
predicated of Jacob and Leah, as is evident from (verse 10), where Jacob says,
”Shall I and thy mother and thy brethren indeed come to bow down ourselves to
thee to the earth?“ for by Jacob is represented natural good, and by Leah
natural truth, as before occasionally shown. The Divine which comes from the
Lord is in the supreme sense the Divine in Him; but in the relative sense is the
Divine from Him. The Divine good
from Him is what is called celestial, and the Divine truth from Him is what is
called spiritual. When the rational
receives these, the good and the truth of the rational are what are signified;
but when the natural receives them, the good and truth of the natural are what
are signified. Here they are the good and truth of the natural, because they are
predicated of Jacob and Leah.
AC 4697.
And eleven stars.
That this signifies the knowledges of good and truth, is evident from the
signification of ”stars,“ as being the knowledges of good and truth.
That ”stars“ have this signification in the Word is because they are
small luminaries which shine at night, when they give forth into our atmosphere
gleams of light, just as knowledges give forth gleams of good and truth.
That such knowledges are signified by ”stars,“ is evident from many
passages in the Word, as in Jeremiah:
Thus
said Jehovah who giveth the sun for a light by day, and the ordinances of the
moon and of the stars for a light by night, who stirreth up the sea that the
waves thereof are tumultuous (Jer. 31:35);
where a new church is
treated of, and by ”giving the sun for a light by day“ is signified the good
of love and of charity, and by ”giving the ordinances of the moon and of the
stars for a light by night“ is signified truth and knowledges.
[2] So too in David:
Jehovah
who made great luminaries, the sun to rule by day, and the moon and stars to
rule by night (Ps. 136:7-9);
one who knows nothing of the
internal sense of the Word will believe that by the ”sun“ here is meant the
sun of the world, and by the ”moon and stars,“ the moon and stars of the
world; but from this arises no spiritual and heavenly sense, and yet the Word is
heavenly in every particular; from which again it is evident that the goods of
love and charity, and the truths of faith, together with the knowledges of
these, are what is signified.
[3] So also in the first
chapter of Genesis, where the new creation of the celestial man is described:
God
said, Let there be luminaries in the expanse of the heavens to distinguish
between the day and the night; and let them be for signs and for stated times,
and for days and for years; and let them be for luminaries in the expanse of the
heavens to give light upon the earth; and it was so And God made two great
luminaries; the greater luminary to rule by day, and the lesser luminary to rule
by night; and the stars. And God set them in the expanse of the heavens to give
light up on the earth, and to rule in the day and in the night, and to
distinguish between the light and the darkness (Gen. 1:14-18; n. 30-38).
[4] In Matthew:
Immediately
after the affliction of those days the sun shall be darkened, and the moon shall
not give her light, and the stars shall fall from heaven, and the powers of the
heavens shall be shaken (Matthew 24:29);
that here by the ”sun and
moon“ are signified love and charity, or good and truth, and by the
”stars“ knowledges, may be seen above (n. 4060); and because the last day or
the last state of the church is here treated of, by ”the sun being darkened
and the moon not giving her light“ is signified that then the good of love and
of charity Will perish; and by ”the stars falling from heaven,“ that the
knowledges of good and of truth will also perish.
[5] That these things are
signified, is evident from the prophetic parts of the Word, in which similar
things are said of the last state of the church, as in Isaiah;
Behold
the day of Jehovah cometh cruel, to make the earth a waste, and He shall destroy
the sinners thereof out of it For the stars of the heavens and the
constellations thereof shall not shine with their light the sun shall be
darkened in his rising, and the moon shall not cause her light to shine (Isa.
13:9, 10).
In Joel:
The
day of Jehovah is near. The sun and the moon have been blackened, and the stars
have withdrawn their shining (Joel 3:14, 16).
In Ezekiel:
When
I shall extinguish thee I will cover the heavens, and I will blacken the stars
thereof; I Will cover the sun with a cloud, and the moon shall not make her
light to shine, all the luminaries of light in heaven will I make black over
thee, and will set darkness upon thy land. (Ezek. 32:7, 8)
And in the Revelation:
The
fourth angel sounded, and the third part of the sun was smitten, and the third
part of the moon, and the third part of the stars; that the third part of them
should be darkened, and the day should not shine for the third part of it, and
the night in like manner (Rev. 8:12).
[6] Moreover that
”stars“ are the knowledges of good and truth is plain from the following
passages: in Daniel:
Out
of one of the horns of the he-goat came forth a little horn, and it grew
exceedingly toward the south, and toward the east, and toward adornment. And it
grew even to the army of the heavens; and some of the army and of the stars it
cast down to the earth, and trampled upon them (Daniel 8:9, 10);
and in the Revelation:
The
great dragon with his tail drew the third part of the stars of heaven, and did
cast them to the earth (Rev. 12:4).
That ”stars“ are not
meant in these passages, is evident. In
Daniel and the Revelation
is described the state of the church in its last times.
[7] Likewise in David:
Jehovah
counteth the number of the stars; He giveth names to all (Ps. 147:4).
Again:
Praise
ye Jehovah sun and moon, praise Him all ye stars of light (Ps 148:3)
And in the Revelation:
A great sign was seen in heaven; a woman encompassed with the sun, and the moon under her feet, and upon he